Alpine solar plants in Switzerland
Alpine solar installation on the dam wall of the Oberaarsee (2300m.a.s.l., Bernese Oberland, Switzerland).
The following alpine solar power plants have been publicly announced in Switzerland or have received initial or final approval:
Sorting:
Name |
Height m.a.s.l. |
Canton |
Power MWp |
Spec. yield Year kWh/kWp |
Spec. yield Winter kWh/kWp |
Winter- Share % |
Status |
Belalp-Solar |
2650 |
VS |
8.1 |
1593 |
691 |
43.4 |
publicly available |
Bernina Solar |
2481 |
GR |
12.6 |
1448 |
533 |
36.8 |
publicly available |
Felsenstrom, Walensee |
454 |
SG |
9.4 |
1278 |
562 |
44.0 |
publicly available |
Gibidum Solar |
2200 |
VS |
28.0 |
1607 |
714 |
44.4 |
publicly available |
Gletschersolar Matterhorn |
2900 |
VS |
7.7 |
1636 |
571 |
34.9 |
publicly available |
Gondo Solar |
2071 |
VS |
15.9 |
1390 |
541 |
38.9 |
granted first instance |
Grengiols Solar |
2382 |
VS |
92.0 |
1609 |
696 |
43.2 |
publicly available |
Hahnenmoosbärgli (Lenk) |
2014 |
BE |
10.0 |
1430 |
613 |
42.9 |
publicly available |
Hintisberg (Lütschental) |
1700 |
BE |
10.1 |
1247 |
527 |
42.3 |
publicly available |
Hohsaas |
3142 |
VS |
7.5 |
1521 |
631 |
41.5 |
granted first instance |
Madrisa Solar |
1962 |
GR |
10.8 |
1565 |
667 |
42.6 |
under construction |
Mont Soleil |
1250 |
BE |
8.5 |
1343 |
539 |
40.1 |
granted first instance |
Morgeten Solar |
2127 |
BE |
8.3 |
1446 |
646 |
44.7 |
granted first instance |
NalpSolar |
2003 |
GR |
8.1 |
1324 |
505 |
38.1 |
under construction |
Parco Solare Alpino Duragno |
1768 |
TI |
9.9 |
1455 |
768 |
52.8 |
publicly available |
Prafleuri Solar |
2800 |
VS |
9.2 |
1663 |
615 |
37.0 |
publicly available |
PV Alpin Parsenn |
2444 |
GR |
8.3 |
1458 |
587 |
40.3 |
granted first instance |
PVA Gries |
2450 |
VS |
14.0 |
1500 |
600 |
40.0 |
publicly available |
Scuol Solar |
2272 |
GR |
33.6 |
1432 |
637 |
44.5 |
publicly available |
Sedrun Solar |
2029 |
GR |
19.2 |
1615 |
750 |
46.5 |
under construction |
Sidenplangg |
1894 |
UR |
8.0 |
1393 |
572 |
41.1 |
under construction |
Solar Magriel |
2189 |
GR |
9.0 |
1622 |
600 |
37.0 |
granted first instance |
Solarkraftwerk Samedan |
1705 |
GR |
14.5 |
1345 |
632 |
47.0 |
publicly available |
Vorab |
2591 |
GR |
8.6 |
1435 |
567 |
39.5 |
legally approved |
Average |
2145 |
|
15.5 |
1473 |
615 |
41.8 |
|
Number of large alpine solar plants: 24
Last updated: 29.08.2025
Comparison of winter electricity/winter yield of test systems/statements on previous building applications for alpine solar plants
The previous building applications for alpine solar plants (see above) show winter yields that are 2 times higher than the winter yield of solar installations in the lowlands. Test installations with appropriate measuring equipment have been set up for practically every planned alpine solar installation. The results of these measurements are likely to have been included in the planning applications.
The factor 2 (= double) refers to the yields of the
Solar plant ALS24, which is located in Hasle-Rüegsau
at the entrance to the Emmental at an altitude of
570m above sea level,
in winter is shaded by
two large trees (larch and fir)
at times and
is not optimized for winter.
Based on the
Studies and media releases from the ZHAW (external link)
the lowland reference plant mentioned above results in a factor of around 2.5. This is still
much less than the postulated 'up to four times greater winter yields' of alpine solar plants. According to the authors of the ZHAW study, the reference plant used delivers less energy per installed kWp than an average solar plant.
The
direct comparison of the
measured yields of a test plant of
SolSarine to the yields of the
Solar plant ALS24 from November 2023 to March 2024 also lead to a
factor of maximum 2, or 2.5.
It is not clear to us where the large difference between the results of the ZHAW and the building applications and the comparison with a test facility in Saanenland comes from. The information provided by the ZHAW seems to us to be very optimistic.
Measurement results from the test facilities at Sedrun Solar and Grengiols Solar
Measurement results are available for two test plants for the summer half-year 2023 (Sedrun Solar) and the winter half-year 2023/24 (Sedrun Solar and Grengiols Solar).
Plant | Specific yield year | Specific yield winter |
| BA | Measured | Difference | BA | Measured | Difference | Factor ALS24 |
| kWh/kWp | % | kWh/kWp | % | |
Sedrun Solar 2029m | 1615 | 1700 | 85 | 5.3 | 750 | 780 | 30 | 4.0 | 2.48 |
Grengiols Solar 2382m | 1609 | | | | 696 | 650 | -46 | -6.6 | 2.06 |
Solaranlage ASL24 570m | | 1170 | | | | 315 | | | 1 |
Sources:
Sedrun Solar and Grengiols Solar,
(externer Link),
ALS24 (Hydrological year 2023/2024)
BA = Building application.
The measurement results of these two test systems are also in the range of the building applications and thus significantly below the ZHAW's forecasts.
The yields of the real plants would be somewhat lower than those of the test plants under the same meteorological conditions. Reasons: Additional shading due to the solar tables being set up in several long rows and not all solar tables will be aligned exactly south.
Sunshine duration in summer 2023 and winter 2023/24
Plant |
Sunshine duration year Summer 2023 and winter 2023/24 |
Sunshine duration winter Winter 2023/24 |
Location Climate Monitor |
|
Norm |
Measured |
Difference |
Norm |
Measured |
Difference |
|
|
Hrs. |
% |
Hrs. |
% |
|
Sedrun Solar 2029m |
1675 |
1623 |
-52 |
-3.1 |
678 |
563 |
-115 |
-17.0 |
Sedrun |
Grengiols Solar 2382m |
1935 |
1778 |
-157 |
-8.1 |
735 |
625 |
-110 |
-15.0 |
Rosswald |
Solaranlage ASL24 570m |
1726 |
1802 |
76 |
4.4 |
565 |
539 |
-26 |
-4.6 |
Rüegsauschachen |
Sources: Climate monitor from MeteoSwiss, climate norm values 1991-2020 from MeteoSwiss.
The values in the table above show how the year or winter was in relation to the average for the years 1991-2020 in terms of sunshine duration. The global radiation values would be more meaningful. These are not available for every location in the MeteoSwiss Climate Monitor.
What we miss
The planned alpine solar plants are supported by the state (= taxpayers) with subsidies of up to 60% of the construction costs. At the same time, these projects benefit from simplified approval procedures. In such a case, we would expect full transparency, which is currently not the case. For example, in the following points:
- Building applications
Although the documents relating to the building applications are made public, they can only be viewed by interested parties in the local municipalities. In the age of the Internet, it would be easy to make documents such as the environmental impact assessment report available for download as a PDF and thus accessible to a larger proportion of taxpayers.
- Measurement results of the test systems
Test installations are set up for practically every planned alpine solar installation. Various measurements are carried out on these test systems. We think it is a pity that these measurement results are not published. These measurement results could provide valuable insights for future projects and would increase transparency. Today, measurement data can be made available online to a large circle of interested parties with little effort.
What we want: Full transparency
If the Alpine "Solar Express" is extended, we hope that full transparency as described above will become mandatory for the projects claiming the high subsidies.
Published / Updated: 1.5.2024 / 29.12.2024